LEADING Mail on Sunday writer Tina Weaver’s column went absent from the paper this week – coinciding with an on-going Byline Investigation into her criminal past as a phone hacking mastermind.
Weaver’s ‘RightMinds’ opinion page did not appear on Sunday as normal – less than 48 hours after we questioned the paper over her recent stories on 10 people whose voicemails she conspired to hack when she was previously editor of tabloid rival the Sunday Mirror.
The Mail on Sunday has given no reason for RightMinds’ omission, and has not said whether the situation is temporary, permanent, or in any way linked to the phone hacking operations Weaver directed at Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) between 2001 and 2010.
“I can see why they might drop her under the circumstances. But the bigger question is: why did they hire her in the first place?” ~ legal source
However, Byline Investigates has run a series of articles on the findings of Britain’s top privacy judge, Mr Justice Mann, about the unlawful activities of Weaver and her senior newsroom team, prior to her joining the MoS in November, 2018.
In a devastating judgment for MGN, only recently released in full, not only did Justice Mann find Weaver, 54, to have been personally involved in the unlawful eavesdropping practice, he said she also gave “wrong” evidence – under oath – to the Leveson Inquiry.
Justice Mann said: “In evidence given to the Leveson Inquiry Ms. Tina Weaver, then still editor of the Sunday Mirror, denied knowledge of phone hacking or even of gossip of it.
“I have already found that she was involved in it, and she clearly had knowledge of it in the evidence I have referred to, and in the light of those findings this evidence was wrong.”
Among hundreds of victims, from all walks of life, of an industrial scale phone hacking operation overseen by Weaver are a growing number whose private lives she has also written about for the Mail on Sunday.
But she has not told the million-a-week-selling paper’s readers – or the police – that she conspired to unlawfully access the voicemails of some of them.
Last week, for example, Weaver wrote about the return of Cold Feet, an ITV drama series first made popular in the 1990s, and which elevated many among its cast into household names.
She wrote: “Back in the late 1990s I was a fully signed up box set-owning member of the Cold Feet generation. The tangled and oh-so-familiar intricacies of the relationships of Adam and Rachel, Pete and Jenny, and Karen and David, fuelled endless chatter with office colleagues and girlfriends.”
ButByline Investigates can reveal that alongside being an avid armchair fan, Weaver was also instructing her journalists to help themselves to the confidential private information of actors James Nesbitt, John Thompson – along with his real-life wife Samantha, now divorced – and Helen Baxendale.
They are joined, among others, including their non-celebrity friends and associates, by entertainer Anthony McPartlin and ex-wife Lisa Armstrong, Hollywood star Gwyneth Paltrow and her former spouse the Coldplay singer Chris Martin, David and Victoria Beckham, and the entertainer Cheryl Cole.
During Weaver’s editorship, the Sunday Mirror published stories about their private lives.
Among them was a front-page story about the marriage difficulties of James Nesbitt, authored by Weaver’s former trusted news executive James Weatherup – a journalist later convicted in a separate phone hacking conspiracy at the News of the World.
Other front-page stories delved into the Beckhams’ marriage in 2004, while the romance between Paltrow and Martin was, from 2002, also a source of constant fascination for Weaver’s newsroom, as were the day-to-day activities of McPartlin, and by extension his ex-wife Armstrong.
Justice Mann’s high court ruling was based on evidence contained in internal Sunday Mirror emails, financial paper trails, and the explosive testimony of whistle-blower Dan Evans, a news reporter who Weaver trained to be the paper’s in-house hacker.
Evans spoke of his time working under Weaver in an exclusive interview with Byline TV.
The judge found that Sunday Mirror journalists, at Weaver’s instruction and sanction, routinely used shadowy private investigators and phone hackers to illegally monitor hundreds – and potentially thousands – of people of interest to her newspaper.
Describing how Weaver directed the hacking, and worried it might be uncovered, he said: “Mr Evans received clear instructions from Ms Weaver about the need to cover his tracks for these unlawful activities.
“Those steps included… not listening to messages until they had been listened to by the victim… [not using] traceable phones for his activities… [not recording] PINs in electronic format.”
The judge went on: “If he transcribed a message to show to [his line manager] or Ms Weaver he would create and print the document on a computer without saving it.”
Justice Mann also told how Weaver feared her paper’s activities, ranged as they were on Members of Parliament, among many others, might alert the domestic security service MI5.
He said: “At one stage MPs were targeted, but Ms Weaver told Mr Evans to stop that because she did not want to risk attracting the attention of the security services.”
Justice Mann said Weaver’s involvement in hacking meant “knowledge of and participation in phone hacking existed at the highest level on the actual journalism… side of the business.”
The Mail on Sunday’s appointment of Weaver to one of its most prominent editorial positions came shortly after Tory Minister Matt Hancock made a unilateral decision before Parliament to cancel the second part of the Leveson Inquiry, which would have re-examined Weaver’s earlier evidence in light of the High Court findings.
Byline Investigates has asked the Metropolitan Police whether it would be acting on the evidence presented in our stories, which appear to show Weaver breached both the Inquiries Act and committed perjury, an offence punishable by up to seven years’ jail, but at the time of writing no investigation had been opened.
On Friday, before Weaver’s column disappeared last week, we asked the Rothermere-owned Mail on Sunday a string of questions about Weaver’s work and modus operandi.
These included queries about risk assessments and concerns about attracting aggravated legal actions from Weaver’s past victims, and the theoretical risks the MoS is accepting by giving their star columnist a roving brief to comment on such people’s private lives.
We also asked whether the Mail on Sunday gets clearance from the paper’s lawyers before writing about people she targeted, given the legal actions against MGN have now cost her last employers £80m – and rising – in costs and damages.
It had yet to comment at the time of publication.
But a legal source said: “I can see why they might drop her under the circumstances. But the bigger question is: why did they hire her in the first place?”
